Book review writing help

January 26, 2018

Writing reviews for books can be an interesting activity for those who like to read and is able to logically express their thoughts on paper. After all, this is one way to share impressions about the book with like-minded people, to present your perception of the plot and character of the characters.

Interestingly expounding his thoughts about what he has read, the reviewer forms readers’ interest in the work or, conversely, discourages the desire to read.

Before writing a review, it is advisable not to read other people’s reviews about the book. Their thoughts are messed up with yours or you start to write not in your own words. It is possible that someone has already expressed his opinion about a work similar to yours. Nevertheless, when writing a review, the impressions of a particular person are important, taking into account his experience and worldview.

Maybe on the contrary, the opinion of the reviewer differs from the generally accepted one. For example, a book is considered universally recognized masterpieces, and the reviewer did not like certain points that spoiled the overall impression of the book. Do not be afraid that the opinion contradicts the majority, in which case it will bring even more benefit to the readers.

It is necessary to observe the principle: the more negative impression about the book is the review, the more it should contain proposals. That is, in this case, it is necessary to analyze the work in more detail and explain what the reviewer did not particularly like. Common mistakes Read the most common mistakes when writing a book review

The most common mistake is the retelling of events occurring in the book. Transition to the author’s personality. Rudeness, familiarity. Application of subjective value judgments (good / bad, talented / untalented).

Where to place the review? After writing a review, the question arises as to where to place it. Options for posting a book review: your own blog; thematic communities; contests of reviews. Writing this contributes to improving not only the essay writers writing skills, but improving it as a reader. Some experienced reviewers argue that the intention to write a review of the work leads to a deeper insight into the plot, pay attention to the details.

Book review writing help

Richard Dunn

April 19, 2018

Book review

What should be the approximate structure of the review of the book? Writing reviews on books can be an interesting activity for those who like to read and is able to logically express their thoughts on paper. After all, this is one way to share impressions about the book with like-minded people, to present your perception of the plot and character of the characters.

An approximate plan for reviewing the book: the introductory part; main idea; critical analysis; conclusions.

For many, the greatest difficulty is writing the beginning of the review. There are no clear rules, everyone chooses what is closer to him. Usually in the introduction, the tone of the review is set. Here are some options for how you can start a review: a brief description of the plot (a book on how …); genre disclosure; an intriguing quote from the book; personal evaluation (liked or disliked the book).

This part of the this should identify the main issues raised in the work, the range of problems and the main idea. Do not retell the main content of the book. The value of the review is given by the ability of the reviewer to assess competently how much the author was able to reveal the characters of the characters and to convey to the readers the main idea of the work, the peculiarities of its style and skill. Critical analysis First of all, attention should be paid to the title of the book, since it expresses the basic idea. Here you can give an estimate of how the time period and place of action are related to the theme of the book, and what mood is created when reading. It is interesting to consider the line of behavior of the main character: how his thoughts, feelings change, with what problems he encounters, his difference from the secondary heroes.

Conclusions. The reviewer assesses the relevance of the work, shares his personal impression of what he read, compares it with other works of the author.

Some criteria for assessing the work: the logic of the plot, the dynamics of the narrative, elaboration and reliability; feelings caused by heroes; author’s style and language; the uniqueness of the work; presence of blunders; relevance; their feelings.

Writing Basics a book review

Richard Dunn

March 30, 2018

Writing Basics

When the book likes everything, no extra words are required. When there are controversial points in it, capital truths or new and frightening, you need something more than a “wand with a point”.

You can make a parsing of the book so that: it is better to learn what you read; publish a blog review and attract additional traffic; show expertise – attract the attention of publishers – start reviewing on a commercial basis.

Criteria for correct review. Full information about the author of the book, title, theme, year of publication, key points of the narrative. Analysis of the book with a reference to a specific target audience. Analytical approach: all good and bad that is in the work are investigated and justified. Sufficient information to form an opinion on the book. The average volume of the review is from 1,000 to 3,000 characters. If more is already a critical article, if less – reader feedback. An analysis of a recently published book: the reviewer makes it from scratch, and not under the influence of the minds of other people. Mention previous works and regalia of the author, without servility or bias. Avoiding transitions to the personality, insults, calls for various types of discord. Absence of any errors in the review.

Book reviews can be roughly divided into: detailed professional analysis; short reviews-articles written by readers; The essay with the dominant personal opinion about the book and the attitude to the author; autoreviews, when the author expresses his work; book reviews.

Bibliographic description – the title of the book, the author, the year of publication (if this reissue – indicate which account), the publishing house.

A small retelling of the content in one to three sentences.

Direct recall (personal impressions).

Analytical part – analysis of the name, content, structure, practical examples, etc.

Allocate all the advantages and disadvantages of the book.

Critics can say a lot about the work from the first pages of the book, but the inexperienced will have to read the text completely. However, ideally the critic is obliged to read the text carefully and fully, so that the conclusions are as reasoned and accurate as possible.

The main thing in writing a review on the book

Richard Dunn

February 13, 2018

The main thing

Review (translation from Latin) is a message, an assessment, a review of a work of art. Its essence is to express a personal attitude to the book. The reviewer, presenting his opinion, forms the impression of the readers. He attracts everyone’s attention to the work or, on the contrary, discourages interest.

To write a review, be sure to carefully read the book. When writing do not use other people’s reviews. Identify the target audience, and in accordance with the form and filing.

Be sure to indicate the authorship and title of the work, the output data (if the book is published). Specify the genre in the form (novel, novel) and in content (fiction, alternative history). Describe the storyline, list the characters, places of action and key points.

Do not retell the book. The purpose of the review is to generate interest in the work, analyze and analyze it. Write according to the plan: the meaning of the title, analysis of content and form, features of the composition, the skill of the author and his style. Evaluate the main idea and relevance of the subject. This is a sample, it is not necessary to disclose all the components, most importantly, make the review interesting and competent.

Describe the impression of the book: powerful or weak, whole or fragmented, pleasant or pathetic. Note how logical the plot is. Pay attention to the heroes: in detail they are described, how natural is their psychology and behavior, what emotions they cause (empathy or disgust). Analyze the reliability of the details.

Indicate errors and blunders, if any. The main thing is to make sure that these are really blunders, and not an intentional distortion of reality and events by the author. Emphasize the social significance, for example, moments useful for education or self-knowledge. Note the relevance of the work, how relevant the topic for society.

Do not go to the person. Working on the review, do not criticize its author. Do not interfere in personal life, religious or political worldviews, habits, illnesses or weaknesses. If you do not have a specific quote from an interview with the author, suppose and conjecture, for example, “like the author wanted to say.” Speak for yourself or a potential reader.

How to write an essay

Richard Dunn

December 12, 2017

General

First, you have to sit down and think. What do you know about this topic? What did you read? What did you hear?

Remember life situations and books that are suited to this topic. If you wish, you can just create your own cases; it is not against the rules.

Remember and briefly retell what famous people wrote about this topic.

And the main thing is what is your opinion about this topic. Thoughts can be controversial.

After brainstorming, you need to start writing your thoughts. Not necessarily in the form of coherent text, you can do it in the form of sketches.

Once all that has occurred in your notebook or laptop, it is necessary to read it several times. And then you have to write a connected text from your notes. Despite the fact that an essay has a free structure, it still has to be an introduction and conclusion. An introduction should smoothly introduce the reader into the subject you discuss, and conclusion ought to contain a certain conclusion, even if it is approximate and conditional.

When you write an essay, try to stick to a certain style. you expound on something scientific, utilize scientific vocabulary, style of logical articles. On the off chance that you expound on a friendship or love, you have to follow the sublime style. If you describe a funny case, use the colloquial style. But it is possible to allow intentional discrepancy between the style of the writing. For example, you write about an event in a school dining room in the form of a scientific article or speech of a well-known politician. This causes a comic effect.

How to write an essay based on the literary text?

Find the problem raised by the author in the text.

It is good if an author clearly express his problems. If not, then you need to do it by yourself. It is better to formulate the problem in the form of an issue that you put into the text. If the entire text is the answer to this question, then you found the problem. It is desirable to mention the problem (the main question) in the first paragraph of an essay.